(800) 306-6682     Text me at:   (808) 218-1025
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

George E. Donaldson, J.D

P.O. Box 25884
Honolulu, HI 96825

(808) 218-1025

(800) 306-6682

(808) 732-6999

 

 

 
TORTS:     

INTENTIONAL TORTS         

bullet

Torts to the Person

  1. Battery

  2. Assault

  3. False Imprisonment

  4. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress

   Defenses: 

bullet

Consent

bullet

Self-Defense

bullet

Defense of Third Person

bullet

Defense of Land or Chattels

bullet

Force to Effect Recapture of Chattels Wrongfully Withheld

bullet

Privilege of Arrest

bullet

Torts to Property             

  1. Trespass to Land

  2. Trespass to Chattels

  3. Conversion of Chattels

    Defenses:

bullet

Consent

bullet

Privileged Invasion of Another's Land to Reclaim Chattels

bullet

Privilege to Exclude or Evict Trespassing Chattels of Another

bullet

Privileged Invasion of Another's Land or Chattels as a Public necessity

bullet

Privileged Invasion of Another's Land or Chattels as a Private Necessity

bullet

Privileged Invasions of Land or Chattels to Abate a Nuisance

NEGLIGENCE             

Investigations should proceed through a sequence of elements methodically finding an appropriate act or actionable omission before turning to the issue of "duty," and that there is a breach of duty before considering "causation." 

Elements of the Prima Facie Case:    Act or Omission, Duty, Breach, Causation / Proximate Cause, and Damages

     Defenses to Negligence

bullet

Contributory Negligence:  Plaintiff's conduct is a contributing cause to his own injuries and is a complete bar to any recovery for the negligence of the defendant.  There are exceptions.  Many states reject this as a defense and replaces it with Comparative Negligence.

bullet

Comparative Negligence:  ...rejects the notion that contributory negligence is always a bar to recovery by plaintiff.  It individualizes accident recoveries on the parties in proportion to their fault.

bullet

Assumption of the Risk:  It must be shown that the plaintiff recognized and understood the particular risk or danger involved and voluntarily chose to encounter it.

(note:  Hawaii had adopted the doctrine of modified comparative negligence.  HRS § 663-31 (1995).  Under this doctrine, a claimant's action is barred if his negligence exceeds the combined negligence of all defendants.  Otherwise, the claimant's recovery is diminished in proportion to his degree of negligence.  See also: http://www.mcandl.com/hawaii.html for  a summary on Hawaii Medical Malpractice law.)

STRICT LIABILITY         

Investigations should determine whether the facts involved fall into one of the recognized categories of cases in which courts are willing to impose strict liability, liability without any fault.  Those facts are:

bullet

Defendant's animals cause an injury; or

bullet

Defendant is involved in an abnormally dangerous activity

Elements of the Prima facie case:  Act or Omission, Duty to Avoid Harm, Breach, Cause/Proximate Cause, and Damages.

   Defenses to Strict Liability:

bullet

Comparative Negligence

bullet

Assumption of the Risk

PRODUCTS LIABILITY    

bullet

Liability based on Intentional Torts (a battery).

bullet

Liability based on Negligence (harm must be foreseeable).

bullet

Liability based on Strict Liability (defective product that caused injury).

bullet

Liability based on breach of an express or implied warrant (especially U.C.C. warranties of fitness for a particular purpose and merchantability).

    Defenses:

  1. Contributory negligence (but is no defense to intentional torts).

  2. Comparative negligence

  3. Assumption of the Risk

  4. Disclaimers (for Strict Liability)

  5. Statute of Limitations (applies to strict liability injuries)

  6. Preemption (federal legislation has impliedly preempted state tort law on strict liability).

  7. Disclaimers (A manufacturer or seller may limit or exclude warranties that would otherwise arise from the sale of goods).

  8. Notice Requirements (Warranty actions may be barred if the injured purchaser fails to give the seller timely notice of breach).

  9. Statute of Limitations ( The usual warranty limitations period is four years, running from the delivery of the goods).

NUISANCE             

Elements of the Prima Facie Case:

  1. Act by Defendant

  2. Non-trespass Invasion of Plaintiff's Interest

  3. Intent, Negligence, or Strict Liability (Defendant's Conduct)

  4. Substantial and Unreasonable Harm

  5. Causation

    Defenses:

bullet

Contributory Negligence except for intentional nuisance.

bullet

Assumption of Risk

DEFAMATION          

Element of the Prima Facie case at common law:

  1. Publication to Third Person

  2. Understood as Defamatory of Plaintiff

  3. Allege Falsity

  4. Causation

  5. Damages

A prima facie case of defamation at common law required the publication to some third person of a statement that harmed the reputation of the plaintiff, thereby causing the plaintiff to suffer damages.  Except for the defense of truth and for certain narrowly defined classes of privileged communications, defamation was generally a strict liability tort.

   Defenses:

bullet

Consent

bullet

Truth

bullet

Common Law Absolute Privileges

  1. Legislative privilege

  2. Judicial privilege

  3. Domestic privilege

bullet

Common Law Conditional or Qualified Privileges

bullet

Fair Comment privilege

bullet

Record Libel privilege

bullet

Federal Preemptive privileges

bullet

Defenses of Republishers

bullet

SLAPP Suits (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public participation)

bullet

CONSTITUTIONAL PRIVILEGES

Problems involving defamation should also be investigated for invasion of the right of Privacy or the Wrongful Causing of Emotional Distress.

WRONGFUL INVASION OF PRIVACY   (HRS:  SURVEILLANCE  LAWS  IN  HAWAII & Hawaii Stalking Laws)

bullet

INTRUSIONS INTO PLAINTIFF'S PRIVATE LIFE OR AFFAIRS

Elements or the Prima Facie Case:

  1. Highly Offensive Intrusion by Defendant into Plaintiff's Private Life

  2. Intent or Negligence

  3. Causation

Note:  Wiretapping Plaintiff's home would be a clear invasion of privacy.  But if Plaintiff sought a disability pension or filed a personal injury complaint, an investigator's efforts to photograph Plaintiff in public would not intrude on reasonable expectations of privacy.

Note also that:   Trespass on periphery of Plaintiff's land does not show unreasonable surveillance and does not amount to invasions of privacy.

   Defense:  Consent

bullet

PUBLIC DISCLOSURE OF PRIVATE FACTS

Elements of the Prima Facie Case:

  1. Highly Offensive Public Disclosure by Defendant of Private Facts about Plaintiff

  2. No Legitimate Public Interest

  3. Fault in Making the Disclosure

   Defenses:

bullet

Truth is no defense

bullet

Consent

bullet

Constitutional Privilege

bullet

APPROPRIATION OF PLAINTIFF'S NAME OR LIKENESS

Elements of the Prima Facie Case:

  1. Unauthorized use by Defendant of Plaintiff's Name or Likeness for a Commercial Purpose

  2. Causation

   Defense:  Newsworthiness

OTHER TORTS INCLUDE:

  1. Misrepresentation

  2. Injurious Falsehood

  3. Interference with Economic Relations

  4. Unjustifiable Litigation

Tort investigations are concerned with both subjects at once, i.e., what interests of plaintiff should be protected from what kinds of interferences by defendant. 

The Bureau's services are predicated on knowledge of Civil Laws (Torts) and their Defenses which is the primary foundation for an investigator's perspicacity necessary for evidence discovery and acquisition.  Our requisite professional credentials have earned us the compulsory credibility necessary to educe cooperation from individuals with relevant and reliable information.  We do more than just take pictures.  We know what to look for, what to ask, how to ask, and whom to ask.

Our reports are comprehensive, thorough, and may include addenda of supporting documentation, videos, photographs and/or drawings.

Above all, we are committed to the axiomatic norms of professionalism.  All investigations are confidential and conducted within the parameters and limitations of authority using personal initiative in the management of all cases at a nominal expense.

Talk to us for a free consultation we may save you an enormous amount of money on pre-trial discovery, investigation inquiries, and evidence acquisition.

It is economically prudent to investigate your case before litigation.  Give us a call toll free at (800) 306-6682 or (808) 732-6999.

 

 

The Bureau of Private Investigation's  is a Full Service Investigation Company. Including access to an accredited private Forensic Laboratory for DNA Y-Chromosome testing, Forensic Serology & DNA analysis, Human Identification, and Paternity testing.

As a full service Agency, we can customize investigations to meet your needs and budget. 

*

We are not only the leaders in the field of Private Investigation and set the example in Professionalism but we train others as well.  Check out our PI School.

*

 

   

Contact me personally at:

g e o r g e @ p i b u r e a u . u s    or    i n v e s t i g a t o r s @ p i b u r e a u . c o m